Gunchenko O. N., Vyshnevskyi D. A., Bykova Yu. S.
DEFINITION OF
RESTRICTIONS WHEN YOU RUN THEORETICAL
STUDIES BY
VALUATION OF PRODUCTION RISK
Introduction. The control system of
labour protection, which exist in Ukraine at national level and at
the level of companies and enterprises has a row of failings. In particular,
there are the imperfection of methods of identification of occupational risks,
poor information and analytical support of system of labor protection
management, lack of scientific substantiation of a synergistic effect on the
growth of human factors of production, cumbersome methods for determining the
economic effect of labor protection measures among others. Aims and
Objectives. The improvement of the existing system of labor protection management
in Ukraine
based on risk-based approach. Methods. Analytical and experimental. Results.
According to the research, contradiction, alternative and uncertainty are the
main features of risk. It couse collision of objectively existing risky actions
or technologies with their subjective evaluation and require the need of choise
of specific solutions or activity from some options and accompanied with the
inaccuracy or incomplete information about the conditions of work of new
technological system for example. Conclusions. According to the
research, there are eight reasons of uncertainty, which is the main feature of
risk in engineering production. The main among them are availability of
contradictions in technologies and probabilistic feature by embedding,
limitations in the financial, material and human resources.
Key words:
labor protection, productional risk, OSH,
technological system, workplace, harmful and dangerous production factors.
References
1. Occupational health and safety
management systems OHSAS 18001:2007, 2007. 29 p.
(in Russ.)
2. Occupational
health and safety management systems – Guidelines for the implementation of
OHSAS 18001:2007: BS OHSAS
18002:2008, 2000. 122 p. (in Russ.)
3. Stupnytska
N.V. Pіdvyshchennia efektyvnostі planuvannia zakhodіv zapobіhannia vyrobnychomu travmatyzmu na pіdpryiemstvakh mashynobuduvannia: avtoref. dis. ekon.
nauk [Improve the planning of activities to prevent
occupational injuries at mechanical engineering enterprises: Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.]. Lvіv: Lvіvska Polіtekhnіka, 1999. 22
p.
4. Kruzhylko
O.Ye. Udoskonalennia kompleksnoi otsіnky stanu okhorony pratsі na pіdpryiemstvakh: avtoref. dis. ekon. nauk
[Improvement of integrated assessment of labor protection in enterprises: Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.]. Kyiv: NNDІOP, 2001. 20
p.
5. Gunchenko
O.M. Vdoskonalennia systemy upravlіnnia okhoronoiu pratsі na mashynobudіvnykh pіdpryiemstvakh: avtoref. dis. ekon. nauk
[Improvement of the OSH
management system for engineering enterprises: Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.]. Luhansk: SNU іm. V. Dalia,
2007. 20 p.
6.
Hohіtashvіlі H.H., Karchevski
Ye.-T., Lapin V.M.
Upravlіnnia okhoronoiu pratsі ta ryzykom za mіzhnarodnymy standartamy [OSH management and risk
according to international standards]. Kyin:
Znannia,
2007. 367 p.
7. Guidelines
on occupational safety and health management systems: ILO-OSH 2001, 2007. 18 p. (in Russ.)
8. Savchenko
І.V.
Vdoskonalennia metodіv
zabezpechennia normovanykh parametrіv promenevoho opromіnennia na
robochykh mіstsiakh
mashynobudіvnykh
pіdpryiemstv:
avtoref. dis. ekon. nauk [Improvement
methods to ensure normalized parameters of radiation exposure in the workplace
engineering enterprises: Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.].
Luhansk: SNU іm.
V. Dalia, 2013. 20 p.
9. Suvorov
G.A., Denisov E.I., Ovakimov V.G. Gigiyena
truda, 1999, no. 5. pp. 6-10.
10. Tkachuk
S.P., Lecenko H.H., Tkachuk K.N., Luchko I.A., Vodianyk A.O. Metodychnі rekomendatsіi po vyznachenniu napriamkіv efektyvnoho vkladannia koshtіv v okhoronu pratsі na pіdpryiemstvі
[Guidelines to determine the directions of an effective funds of inserting in
health and safety at the enterprise]. Kyiv: Osnova, 1999. 80 p.
11. Tkachuk
K.N., Lysiuk M.O., Luchko I.A., Vodianyk A.O., Tkachuk S.P., Lesenko H.H.,
Hordan V.I. Metodyka vyznachennia sotsіalno-ekonomіchnoi efektyvnostі zakhodіv shchodo polіpshennia umov і okhorony pratsі
[Methods of determining the socio-economic efficiency of measures to improve
conditions and labor protection]. K.: Osnova, 1999. 95 p.
12. Guide
to occupational health and safety management systems: BS 8800:1996. 1996. 73 p. (in Russ.)
13. .
Gunchenko O.M., Vyshnevskyi D.O. Udoskonalennia
systemy upravlіnnia okhoronoiu pratsі na mashynobudіvnykh pіdpryiemstvakh [Improvement
of the OSH
management system for machine building enterprises]. Bіosfera XXI stolіttia: mater. I vseukr. konf. mol. vchen., asp., magіstr. ta stud. 12-15 liutoho 2008 [Biosphere XXI
century: Materials I-Ukrainian conference of young scientists, graduate
students, masters students, 12-15 febr.] Sevastopol:
SevNTU Publ., 2008, pp. 16-18.
14. Sevastyanov
B.V., Lobova I.Yu. Bezopasnost v
tekhnosfere, 2008, no. 1, pp. 13-18.
15. Sistemy upravleniya kachestvom. Ukazaniya po
uluchsheniyu deyatelnosti [Quality management system. Guidance for performance
improvement]: DSTU ISO 9004-2001. Kyiv: Gosudarstvennyy standart Ukrainy, 2001.
44 p.
16. Belov
P.G. Modelirovaniye opasnykh protsessov v
tekhnosfere [Modeling dangerous processes in the technosphere]. Moscow: Publ. Akademii GZ
MChS RF, 1999. 124 p.
17. Oleksiuk
O.S. Systemy pіdtrymky pryiniattia fіnansovykh rіshen na mіkrorіvnі [System
support financial decision-making at the micro level]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka,
1998. 508 p.
18. Korolev
V.Yu., Bening V.Ye., Shorgin S.Ya. Matematicheskiye
osnovy teorii riska [Mathematical foundations of the theory of risk].
Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2011. 620 p.
19. Vіtlіnskyi V.V. Analіz, otsіnka і modeliuvannia ekonomіchnoho ryzyku [Analysis,
evaluation and simulation of economic risk]. Kyiv: DEMІUR, 1996. 212
p.
20. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I. Problema professionalnoho riska v meditsyne truda [The problem of
occupational exposure in occupational medicine]. Moscow: Trovant, 2003. pp.
23-28.
21. Minko
V.M. Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye v
upravlenii okhranoy truda [Mathematical modeling in the management of occupational
safety and health]. Kaliningrad: FGUIPP Yantarnyy skaz, 2002. 184 p.
Information about the authors:
Full article
| 
Main 
